Roth 401k

Roth-IRA-401kWhen congress passed its fiscal cliff package for 2013, they included new provisions regarding Roth 401(k)s.  Unfamiliar with Roth 401(k)s?  They offer tax free withdrawals for retirees who invest with after tax funds.  The Roth is appealing to those who expect to pay more in taxes in the future than they do now.  Roth 401(k)s can also help to reduce retirees’  taxable income upon which Social Security is taxed and Medicare premiums are calculated.

The new provisions allow any participant in a 401(k) plan, regardless of how close to retirement they are, to convert all or part of their traditional 401(k) into a Roth 401(K) and continue to contribute to the Roth 401(k) with after tax income if the plan offers the Roth option. Participants would pay taxes on the funds they choose to convert and any company pretax matching funds would be maintained in a separate, traditional 401(k) where taxes would be paid out when the funds are withdrawn.

A few concerns for the Roth 401(k):

  • The conversion to a Roth 401k is not reversible -  Unlike a Roth IRA that allows a participant to change his/her mind and avoid paying taxes, if a Roth 401(k)’s assets decline in value after conversion there is no way to reverse the movement and taxes are still owed on the original value.
  • Participants cannot split the tax payment – Unlike a conversion from an IRA or traditional 401(k) to a Roth IRA that allows participants to split the payment of tax liability into two years, a 401(k) conversion to a Roth 401(k) is paid all in one tax year.

Is your plan sponsor considering offering a Roth 401(k)?

How are they planning to handle the additional responsibilities associated with ensuring participants are educated on the tax consequences and benefits of the Roth 401(k)?

Proposed Participant Statement Regulations

The Department of Labor is considering new reporting requirements for defined contribution plan statements to participants.  The new regulations would require statements to express the participant’s current account balance as an estimated lifetime stream of payments in addition to the total account balance.  It is also considering requiring participant statements to project the expected balance at retirement and what the estimated payments for the projected balance would be.  These proposed regulations are intended to motivate participants to save more for retirement.

Do you think these additional requirements will motivate participants?

What difficulties do you foresee in implementation?

 

Stable Value Funds

Stable value funds are insurance products that guarantee a return of principle and plus interest rate at a contract rate to participants.   According to an article in the May 2013 Employee Benefit Adviser magazine, it is the plan sponsor’s fiduciary duty to evaluate what the worst case scenario would be should the plan, not the individual participant, choose to terminate a stable value fund at a time when the market value of the fund  is below the book value of the fund.  Some stable value funds may offer a put option that would guarantee that fund participants would receive book value on their investment even if the fair market value is less than its book value at the time of plan level termination.

As a plan sponsor, are you aware of the provisions for termination of stable value funds in your plan?

If there is no put option associated with your stable value fund, does the plan have alternative methods to compensate participants for their potential loss should the fund be terminated?

Dollar Cost Averaging

Investors may not know it but, if they are participating in their company’s retirement savings plan, they are probably already practicing the investment strategy of dollar-cost averaging.   Dollar-cost averaging is the process of investing equal, regular installments over a period of time to take advantage of fluctuations in the market.  As the market fluctuates, the investor will buy more shares at lower prices and fewer shares at higher prices while maintaining the same investment amount.

Dollar-cost averaging avoids the pitfalls of trying to time the market.  With lump sum investments you risk investing right before the market drops which, after suffering a large loss, may create fear and regret that will prevent the investor from investing again.  Dollar-cost averaging works well in times of volatile markets and can limit the losses experienced when markets fall.

The Forgotten 401(k) account

Most of today’s professionals expect to work for more than one employer within their lifetime.  Multiple employers may mean multiple retirement accounts.  As participants move from one employer to the next, they may lose track of those accounts with smaller deferral amounts.  Plan sponsors should be motivated to help those inactive participants keep track of and recoup their deferrals.  Keeping only active participants in the plan can help keep the plan’s costs down and, if the plan falls below 100 participants, eliminate the need for an annual audit.

 

The best practice for plan sponsors is to remind terminating participants that they may have the option to rollover funds to an IRA or another employer’s 401(k).  If plan sponsors lose track of inactive participants and alternatives such as internet searches and emergency contacts don’t produce results, plan sponsors may post participant names to the National Registry for Retirement Benefits for free.  This might give the inactive participant the opportunity to collect the account if it occurs to the participant to search the database.   As a last resort, plan sponsors may employ the letter forwarding services of the Social Security Administration, but be warned, they will charge a non-refundable fee for this service and will not confirm delivery or tell the plan administrator the location of the inactive participant.

 

A Defense of the 401(k)

GambleA recent Frontline documentary “The Retirement Gamble” aired on PBS preaching doom and gloom for 401(k) Plans.  It navigated its way through the turmoil of the stock market over the last 13 years emphasizing the risks that participants are “forced to shoulder as they struggle to save enough for retirement.”  According to the broadcast, many participants don’t know of the fees associated with their 401(k), fail to calculate the amount of savings they will need to retire, and take advice from brokers and agents, who may have monetary motivation for their recommendations.  With all these problems, the documentary leaves the impression that the system is broken and should be scrapped all together.

While it is true that the creation of 401k Plans transfers more responsibility for retirement savings to employees, all hope is not lost.  401(k) Plans are a tool better suited to a modern workforce where employees will often experience multiple job changes throughout their lifetime.  There are multiple methods and tools employers may use in connection with  a 401(k) Plan to help participants understand their 401(k) Plan and the risks related to retirement.   A well designed plan, administered by an employer that has the best interests of its employees in mind, helps mitigate the pitfalls within a 401(k) Plan.

With all the recent negativity in the news media surrounding the future of retirement in America, how do you keep plan participants motivated to secure their future?

How do you help with the pessimism that can lead them to stop planning for the future?

Danger of the Target Date Fund

money targetTarget date funds have recently become popular as default investments for retirement plans.  A mix of stocks and bonds under the supervision of an investment manager, the ratio of assets held to optimize the risk stability of the portfolio changes as the participant nears their “target date” for retirement.  In particular, the ratio of bonds to stocks increases.  A recent Wall Street Journal article pointed out the danger of relying on these target date funds that have high ratios of bonds to stocks.  Interest rates have been at an all time low in recent years but they aren’t expected to stay that way.  As interest rates rise, the value of those bonds with low interest rates will drop in value.   This drop in value could negatively affect participant retirement security if their portfolio is heavily invested in bonds in anticipation of approaching retirement.  After the market tanked in 2008, most are aware of the risks associated with stock ownership.

 

How many participants are aware of the risks associated with bonds and this current market?

Social Security & Retirement Calculations

SSNAccording to the Employee Benefits Research Institute, 70% of today’s retirees say Social Security makes up the majority of their income.  Worker’s nearing retirement age (55 and older) are more likely than younger workers to believe that Social Security will provide the same amount of benefits as those received by today’s Social Security retirement beneficiaries .  So what are the younger generations doing to prepare for retirement if they doubt the reliability of Social Security?  Recent surveys have indicated how poorly the majority of American’s are doing at saving for retirement.  Despite the reported insecurity in the Social Security system, many Americans appear to be defaulting to relying on Social Security as their primary source of income in retirement.

The Social Security Retirement program is projected to run out of funds at its current benefit rates in 20 years.  This means that in order to maintain some minimum benefits for all Americans, benefits will have to be cut, taxes raised, or a combination of both.  Already proposed by the current administration, the Chained CPI  would alter the annual inflation calculation for Social Security benefits so that inflation would be calculated at a slower rate.  It appears inevitable that changes are coming to Social Security.

What level of benefits do you expect to receive from Social Security?

Have you made changes to 401k contributions based on your confidence in Social Security?

Retirement Savings Cap?

images (3)Recently, President Obama proposed limiting the amount that could be saved in a tax-advantaged retirement account.  The proposed cap, based on an annuity of $205,000 per year for a “comfortable” retirement, taking into consideration inflation and interest rates, is calculated to be $3 million for someone 65 years old retiring in 2013.  Balances would be reviewed each year and if contributions pushed the balance over the cap, participants would be required to remove any excess and be subject to their standard tax rate.  This proposal estimates that it would raise taxes by $9 billion over ten years.
What do you think of the President’s proposal?  Is his projection of $205,000 per year really enough for a comfortable retirement?  How would a cap affect the participant’s retirement security?  What happens if the limit is imposed and just a few years before a participant’s retirement the market takes a dive?

ETFs-Buyer Beware

As the emphasis on the effect of investment fees on retirement outcomes and new regulations for fiduciary responsibility for 401(k) fee reporting has increased, index funds and ETFs, marketed for their low fees, have become increasingly popular.   According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, increased demand has inspired the creation of new index funds and ETFs.   However, some of these funds have become specialized, restrictively defining the markets that they are tracking, which may increase the expense of the fund and unwittingly limit the diversity of your investment portfolio.  Before selecting an ETF, make sure you know the actual fee ratio associated with the fund, what your risk versus reward tolerability is, and how the fund will affect the makeup of your portfolio.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.